It makes a huge difference in how you think about reading and education if you are convinced that God thought it was good to communicate with the world through a book. There are dozens of foolish ideas about education that we will be protected from by simply thinking God was wise in using a book.
And it makes a huge difference in how you think about many things if you are convinced that God thought the world should have a book that contains
- fact-laden narrative history,
- poetry (lots of poetry)
- stories (lots of stories)
- seraphic prophecy like Isaiah 40-66
- logically constructed, doctrinally dense letters like Romans,
- repetitive, spiraling letters like 1 John, and
- symbol-laden prophetic books like Revelation.
For example, if someone starts to overstate the case for “story” and says that the “real” way to communicate God’s truth is in “story,” implying that the other ways are “less real” and marginal, we will be protected from that sort of thing because we are convinced that God thought the tightly argued, doctrinal book of Romans was a very good idea for the world to have.
Or, on the other hand, if someone starts to overstate the case of doctrinal exposition to the exclusion and minimization of story and poetry, we will be protected from that sort of thing, because we are convinced that God thought it wise to put two-thirds of the Old Testament in poetry and fill it up with stories.
It is a great liberation to take the Bible—all of it, and as we have it—very seriously.
~ John Piper, on the Desiring God Blog